Building Resilience in Transformation and Change...
3 Risks Investment Banks Face on IPO Day
How Automating Regulatory Reporting Can Increase Human...
Why Do You Need to Improve Your Enterprise Change...
What is Enterprise Change?
Why You Need to Rethink the Way You View Resilience
OCC Risk Perspective Shows Link Between Change Management &...
Is Treasury Committee Banking Inquiry Missing Root Cause of...
January 6, 2017
Financial regulation is essential for protecting the banking industry and consumers. Since the financial crisis, regulation has played an even greater role in financial services. This has led to increased scrutiny of banks and the way they operate, putting them under increased pressure. It is essential that they can prove that they are adhering to regulatory rules. Increased regulation typically leads to a bigger workload for those working in banking. It can stifle innovation by driving up the cost of doing business as usual. The more resources allocated to complying with regulations, the less there is for discretionary spending on innovation.
Banks under strict scrutiny from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). There is also increased political and media attention as the public has become more critical of banks than ever before. This is due to lost confidence brought about by the financial crisis and higher customer expectations caused by technological innovation. They're used to getting results quickly and easily from other industries and are starting to expect the same from banks.
As rapid innovation takes place in finance, regulation needs to keep pace and innovate too. It is important for banks to stay technologically relevant to retain their competitive edge, but also to remain compliant. Banks are in the business of managing risk, but regulators must ensure that these risks are measured and responsible. Institutions face significant fines and reputational damage if something they do negatively impacts on the market, their employees or customers.
New technologies can help to mitigate risks. However, adopting new technologies (e.g. a new payments system) could lead to increased vulnerability to risks such as cyber attacks. While legacy systems can come with the risk of failure, transferring to a new system carries significant risks that may not be fully understood. Vulnerabilities in the system may not be identified until during or after the transition. Banks must make careful decisions around innovation to remain competitive within a compliant framework.
Though regulation may be seen to inhibit growth, the growing RegTech industry seeks to innovate regulation and encourage innovation in finance. By funding startup incubators and creating sandbox environments, many regulatory bodies seek to balance risks while also encouraging innovation. Far from wanting to prevent business growth, regulators are keen to find innovative ways of regulating banks while working in conjunction with them.
When executing critical events, banks must be even warier of conduct risk. A problem with the execution of a new system could negatively impact the market, customers, and employees. E.g. if there is a failed event that means employees at a branch are unable to serve their customers, the bank would be liable. If there is a problem during implementation, the bank also needs to prove that it maintained integrity throughout the decision-making process. For this reason, it is important that those working on the implementation take care to keep accurate records. This can be challenging in the midst of a critical event. Post-event, they must reconstruct the event for regulators to demonstrate that they have adhered to regulations. This can be difficult when reconstructing from phone records, emails and the memories of those involved. This system leaves key individuals open to personal risk and liability for mistakes if certain information is not verifiable.
Using Cutover mitigates regulatory risk
Cutover makes the work related to regulatory compliance easier and removes much of the burden of proof from individuals, as it automatically keeps a record of everything that happens during a critical event. The Audit Log shows every action, decision, handover, and implementation that occurred during the event, who was involved and when those things happened compared to when they were planned for. This removes the need for the laborious piecing together of the event after the fact, reducing cost and time and dramatically improving accuracy. Using the Cutover platform to update their internal systems and processes can help banks to reduce all kinds of risks related to critical IT change events.